The Imperative of UAP Disclosure: A Call for Clarity in the Halls of Congress

By Anthony F. Sanchez, Author & UFO Researcher
For UFO Currents

As we stand on the precipice of what could be the most profound revelation in human history—the existence of non-human entities and their advanced spacecraft—it becomes evident that the path to disclosure is fraught with obstructions, not least of which is the veil of secrecy that has shrouded the subject of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) for far too long.

• • •

On November 8th, 2023, Rep. Eric Burlison submitted and passed an amendment to have UFO/UAP Whistleblower David Grusch’s Security Clearance Reinstated.

Rep. Eric Burlison: I rise in support of this amendment, which would increase slash decrease funding to express that the Office of Personnel Management should renew the security clearance of David Grush. You see, Mr. Grush formerly served as the Reconnaissance Office representative to the UAP Task Force from 2019 to 2021. He recently testified before Congress, claiming that partial fragments and even intact vehicles have been found for decades by the federal government, our allies, and defense contractors. According to Mr. Grush, objects and vehicles retrieved are of “exotic origin,” based on the vehicles’ morphologies and material science testing, and the possession of unique atomic arrangements and radiological signatures. Mr. Grush also told us that the U.S. is in possession of non-human spacecraft and dead pilots. And finally, Mr. Grush told us that he has spoken with intelligence officials whom the U.S. military had briefed on “football field-sized aircraft” that the U.S. government transferred some crashed UAPs to defense contractors, and that the intelligence officials were also briefed on malevolent activity from extraterrestrial beings.

Now, of course, all of this is very interesting to me and a number of my colleagues on the Oversight Committee. And my first question when I had an opportunity for Mr. Grush was to say, “Those are pretty incredible claims, but I’m from the Show-Me State. You’re going to have to show me.” And I requested specific information, which could not be conveyed in that hearing, not in a secure setting. And unfortunately, he’s unable to provide us with any supporting evidence to back up his claims because his security clearance has lapsed.

Now, my understanding is that Mr. Grush did go through the proper channels here by turning over classified information to the IC Inspector General, and he ultimately filed a complaint to the IC Inspector General, alleging that the information that he presented to the IC has been illegally withheld from Congress. So, I’d like to know more about these claims, and so would a number of my colleagues on both sides of the aisles.

The House Clerk: The gentleman yields. Questions on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Missouri. Those in favor say “Aye,” those opposed “No.” In the opinion of the chair, the “Ayes” have it. The amendment is agreed to.

• • •

The case of David Grush, a former representative to the UAP Task Force, illustrates the quagmire between secrecy and the quest for knowledge. Grush’s testimony before Congress revealed tantalizing details about objects of “exotic origin” and the possession of non-human spacecraft by the U.S., sparking a surge of interest and necessitating a reevaluation of our approach to UAP disclosure.

Rep. Eric Burlison’s call to reinstate Grush’s security clearance is not just a bureaucratic maneuver; it represents a pivotal moment in the struggle for transparency. The reluctance to disclose information, as exemplified by Grush’s lapsed clearance, obstructs our collective pursuit to understand the unknown. The acknowledgement by the House to reinstate Grush’s clearance is a beacon of progress, a recognition of the importance of these extraordinary claims and the need for open examination.

As a UFO researcher, I see in Burlison’s advocacy an echo of the broader community’s plea for candor. The imperative to renew Grush’s clearance transcends individual narratives; it is about validating the veracity of claims that have, for decades, been relegated to the fringes. It’s about creating a climate where whistleblowers and witnesses can share their experiences without fear of reprisal—a climate that values evidence over incredulity.

The significance of these developments cannot be overstated. We are potentially at the threshold of a new era—an era where the existence of “football field-sized aircraft” and encounters with malevolent extraterrestrial beings are not just fodder for science fiction but subjects of legitimate study and discourse. The reinstatement of Grush’s clearance may well be a step towards a future where UAP disclosure is the norm, and the shadows that have enshrouded this field are finally lifted.

In this atmosphere of burgeoning UFO/UAP awareness, the onus falls on us, as researchers and citizens, to champion the cause of transparency. We must advocate for a systematic declassification of UAP-related information, ensuring that the insights gleaned are not obscured by the curtains of classification. We must demand accountability and encourage a culture where the security clearances of key individuals, like David Grush, are maintained to facilitate the unencumbered flow of information.

It is our right and responsibility to seek answers. The reinstatement of Grush’s clearance is more than procedural—it’s symbolic of the broader movement towards a future where UAP disclosure is embraced, where our skies are not just safer, but our understanding of them is infinitely richer. As we pursue this path, let us remember that what is dismissed today may indeed be the accepted truth of tomorrow.